- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:15:41 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Yes, it should be in the sense of an expanded name. Good idea to add a TC. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > in step 9 of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5. I see: > > "@datatype is present, and does not have an empty value, and is not set > to rdf:XMLLiteral." > > Is "set to" used in the sense of string literals or expanded names? > > suppose I bind xyz: to the RDF namespace and use > datatype="xyz:XMLLiteral" > > Does that count? > > Is there a relevant test case? if not, please add one. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2010 07:16:17 UTC