- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:05:55 -0600
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Dan Connolly wrote: > No, it doesn't. See section 6.4 RDF URI References > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Graph-URIref > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-URI-reference > > Note that the 2004 RDF specs use "URI reference" in order to > include #fragments, which were not part of URIs in the URI spec > at the time (RFC2396). The current URI standard (RFC3986) > includes #fragments in URIs. Hmmm... if we want to get technical, the RDFa Syntax Specification is based upon XHTML Modularization, and brings in its datatype definitions from there. URI in XHTML Modularization is defined as the XML Schema datatype anyURI [1] [2]. It was my impression that anyURI permitted IRIs. Steven? This was your thing. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstraction.html#dt_URI [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#anyURI -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 16:06:48 UTC