Agenda TC 01/07/2009
A proposal for clarifying the definitions of datatype maps, take II
no citation to Primer in document overview
[Fwd: OWL Working Group Extended]
release candidate of the "rdfbased" testcollection
Next teleconf
Next OWL WG teleconf
Proposal to make certain ontology properties of OWL 2 Full into annotation properties
Responses to LC comments DA1 and SR1
- Re: Responses to LC comments DA1 and SR1
- RE: Responses to LC comments DA1 and SR1
- Re: Responses to LC comments DA1 and SR1
minor error in an example of NF&R
Availability for OWL teleconfs
ECDL 2009 - Registration now open
publications
SSFS clarification: Datatype definitions and typed literals
test case repository (oops)
SSFS & Direct Semantics clarification: Invalid or inconsistent literals
- RE: SSFS & Direct Semantics clarification: Invalid or inconsistent literals
- RE: SSFS & Direct Semantics clarification: Invalid or inconsistent literals
Fwd: documents staged in place [last minute urgent issues]
Test case Nothing-002 incorrectly labeled by WebOnt
documents staged in place
Weekly teleconferences
Possible incorrect test case (?)
RR 2009 Call for Papers
Home page URLs of Editors and Contributors
Agenda TC 10/06/2009
ESWC paper "Who the Heck Is the Father of Bob?"
Re: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL
- RE: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL
- RE: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL
- RE: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL
- RE: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL
- RE: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL
- RE: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL
ECDL 2009 - STUDENT SCHOLARSHIPS
Feedback on XSD 1.1 from the OWL Working Group
ACTION-340 completed (align the spec with the changes to rdf:PlainLiteral)
ACTION-339 - Mapping to RDF updated for rdf:PlainLiteral
Re: Testing the (RL) testing...
- RE: Testing the (RL) testing...
- Re: Testing the (RL) testing...
- Re: Testing the (RL) testing...