Re: Testing the (RL) testing...

Mike Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:21, Markus Krötzsch <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
> 
>>> Sandro offered 'original', and it works for me. I just want to avoid
>>> unnecessary misunderstandings with regard to the word 'normative'...
>> Yes, I agree that there could be confusion here, and I am fine with "original"
>> (there are cases where there is more than one "original" syntax, but this
>> seems to be acceptable). I assume that we agree that this renaming would be an
>> editorial change to Conformance, so it does not interact with our CR schedule.
>> Changing this will affect some words in conformance, the property names in the
>> test ontology, the according properties and exports of the wiki, the
>> processing of these exports in Mike's test software, and the UI of the wiki.
>> Each of those is minor and should not be hard to do.
> 
> A simplification, and what I thought Sandro and Ivan were actually
> proposing, is to change "normative" to "original" *just* in the wiki
> presentation of the test cases - i.e., leave Conformance and the test
> ontologies as is.
> 

Indeed. I do not believe going back to the document is worthwhile and
necessary. It is the wiki presentation of the test cases that can be
misunderstood, so having that changed there seems to be enough...

Ivan


-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf