RE: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL

Hi Boris!

The explaining text below the second example is

[[
In both of these examples, 
the anonymous individuals are connected by property assertions 
in a circular, non-tree-like way.
]]

Perhaps you should not write "circular", since this is only obvious to the
reader for the first of the two examples. Both examples are clearly
non-tree-like, that should suffice to write. Or perhaps write something
like: "circular or diamond-shaped, respectively, ..."?

Cheers,
Michael

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Boris Motik [mailto:boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk]
>Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 10:54 PM
>To: Michael Schneider; 'Ian Horrocks'
>Cc: 'OWL 1.1'
>Subject: RE: question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction
>of OWL 2 DL
>
>Hello,
>
>Yes, you are right.
>
>Boris

--
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
=======================================================================
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor,
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
=======================================================================