- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:28:23 +0100
- To: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
We are *not* having a meeting this week. The initial idea was to go bi-weekly, which would mean have a meeting next week. Allowing a bit more flexibility seemed on the face of it to be a useful refinement. According to this plan interested parties will indicate their availability over the next 2 months (using Doodle) and we will then fix a meeting schedule (and publicise it in the Wiki). Hopefully this doesn't equate to random scheduling and will allow adequate time for individuals to plan their own schedules. Ian On 15 Jun 2009, at 19:29, Evan Wallace wrote: > Randomly deciding when to have meetings makes it difficult to plan > and schedule around them. Doodle is > down. Are we or are we not having a meeting this week? How much > minimum lead time will be given > for such information for future meetings? Will there be someplace > on the wiki look to see when we are not > to meet in a given week? > > Sorry, but someone just moved a meeting here into the normal OWL WG > telecon slot for this week, and I > need to know whether work to have our local meeting moved. > > -Evan > > > >> Rather than having teleconferences on a regular 2 week cycle a >> more flexible option is to have them at the usual time (Wednesday >> 10:00 Boston) but choosing the weeks as needed and as convenient >> for WG members. I set up a doodle poll [1] where we can indicate >> our availability. >> >> Thanks, >> Ian >> >> [1] http://doodle.com/wud67ttgri4d8576
Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 19:29:03 UTC