Re: Testing the (RL) testing...

Perfect! Thanks a lot Markus

Ivan

Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2009, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Mike Smith wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:21, Markus Krötzsch <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de> 
> wrote:
>>>>> Sandro offered 'original', and it works for me. I just want to avoid
>>>>> unnecessary misunderstandings with regard to the word 'normative'...
>>>> Yes, I agree that there could be confusion here, and I am fine with
>>>> "original" (there are cases where there is more than one "original"
>>>> syntax, but this seems to be acceptable). I assume that we agree that
>>>> this renaming would be an editorial change to Conformance, so it does
>>>> not interact with our CR schedule. Changing this will affect some words
>>>> in conformance, the property names in the test ontology, the according
>>>> properties and exports of the wiki, the processing of these exports in
>>>> Mike's test software, and the UI of the wiki. Each of those is minor and
>>>> should not be hard to do.
>>> A simplification, and what I thought Sandro and Ivan were actually
>>> proposing, is to change "normative" to "original" *just* in the wiki
>>> presentation of the test cases - i.e., leave Conformance and the test
>>> ontologies as is.
>> Indeed. I do not believe going back to the document is worthwhile and
>> necessary. It is the wiki presentation of the test cases that can be
>> misunderstood, so having that changed there seems to be enough...
> 
> Good, that's even easier. I have updated the wiki accordingly: the tests now 
> say "original syntax", the input forms just say "syntax".
> 
> Markus
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf