Regrets for Monday
LDP agenda for 3 March 2014
Re: LDP with JSON-LD ... and it looks good !
LDP with JSON-LD … and it looks good !
future work item: real solution to issue-15 (metadata on non-RDF resources)
Re: volunteering for the army
LDP Minutes for 24 February
class hierarchy of containers
Fixing (removing) clause 6.3.1 on LDPC GET needs
TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer
- Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer
- Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer
- Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer
proposal for refactoring Containers
draft of 209 RFC
LDP agenda for 24 February
Re: lossless paging & volunteering for the army
LDPR vs LDPC interaction models
Changed rule for LDPC PUT to be about containment triples
Removed should not use patch to create rule
clarifying containment vs membership
- Re: clarifying containment vs membership
- Re: clarifying containment vs membership
- Re: clarifying containment vs membership
- Re: clarifying containment vs membership
- Re: clarifying containment vs membership
- A simpler way of thinking about containment and membership?
- Re: clarifying containment vs membership
- Re: clarifying containment vs membership
- Re: clarifying containment vs membership
lossless paging using HATEOAS
Completed split of paging from LDP spec
LDP Minutes for 17 February
Changes for latest names/terms accepted from today's meetings are live
some thoughts on ordering
stable paging
who wants lossy paging?
LDP agenda for 17 February
Editors' proposal for types of containers
Editors' proposal for types of resources
overwhelmed by the Terminology section ?
Editors' proposal for membership predicate names
- Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names
- Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names
- Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names
Question regarding involving another member on my team
Re: LDP feedback ( LC-2812)
Clarifying POST behavior for LDPCs.
"document"
normative change pushed
Creating members
To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples
- Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples
- Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples
- Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples
- Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples