- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:15:21 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52FBF279.3040507@openlinksw.com>
On 2/12/14 3:15 PM, Ashok Malhotra wrote: > Thanks, John! > My concern was that we define LDPR, LDP-RR and LDP-BR and the naive > reader may > wonder how these relate to "document". Are they subsets of "document"? > Is LDPR equivalent to "document"? An HTTP 200 OK indicates that you are interacting with a Document that's denoted (named by or referred to) by an HTTP URI i.e., the Document is the referent of the HTTP URI ( also known as an HTTP URL in this particular usage scenario). Kingsley > All the best, Ashok > > On 2/12/2014 1:31 PM, John Arwe wrote: >> *Linked Data Platform Container* (LDPC) >> An LDPR representing a collection of _member_ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#dfn-membership>resources >> and/or _contained_ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#dfn-containment>documents >> (information resources [/_WEBARCH_/ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#bib-WEBARCH>]) >> that ... >> >> serves as the definition du jour . There were suggestions on the >> order of a month ago that we use 'document' instead of 'information >> resource' based on the http-Range experience/wounds, and 'resource' >> when being more general. Since the WG seemed un-allergic to that, we >> started to incorporate it. >> >> FWIW, WebArch doesn't define the term formally either (in the sense >> of putting it in the glossary and so on). What it does, is say >> (section 2.2, paragraph 2): This document is an example of an >> information resource. When I drafted it, I started from the premise >> "what's good for the goose is good for the gander", but nothing stops >> us from adding more if you want to propose something concrete. >> Looking at it with a skeptical eye, the "parens" around _contained_ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#dfn-containment>documents >> (information resources [/_WEBARCH_/ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#bib-WEBARCH>]) >> are not obvious. >> >> Would this clarify, IYO? >> >> collection of _member_ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#dfn-membership>resources >> ([/_WEBARCH_/ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#bib-WEBARCH>]) >> and/or _contained_ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#dfn-containment>documents >> (information resources [/_WEBARCH_/ >> <file:///C:/Arwe/Standards/REST/OSLC/W3CLDP/ldp.html#bib-WEBARCH>]) that >> >> Best Regards, John >> >> Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages >> <http://w3.ibm.com/jct03019wt/bluepages/simpleSearch.wss?searchBy=Internet+address&location=All+locations&searchFor=johnarwe> >> >> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario >> >> >> >> >> From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> >> To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, >> Date: 02/12/2014 08:25 AM >> Subject: "document" >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> The undefined term "document" occurs several times in the >> introductory sections. Is this left over from previous versions? >> Should it be replaced by LDP-RR? >> -- >> All the best, Ashok >> >> > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 22:15:44 UTC