- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 13:07:57 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
I agree. Lossy paging is a non-starter. All the best, Ashok On 2/16/2014 12:32 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > I'm finding LDP's lossy paging to be a showstopper for my app. > > Does someone have a system, in use or planned, which uses paging and doesn't care that it's lossy as per the spec? > > Are you following RFC-5005 and putting up a big warning that everything the user sees might be wrong? If they perform any actions which result in PUT or PATCH, do you know that wont corrupt the database? As far I can tell, you can't PUT or PATCH a paged resource without potentially corrupting it. > > I think I see a pretty simple fix. I'm happy to propose text if people are interested. We could make it "at risk" if people are worried about it actually being too hard to implement. > > -- Sandro > > > >
Received on Sunday, 16 February 2014 18:08:26 UTC