- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:18:42 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <530BA922.9080201@openlinksw.com>
On 2/24/14 1:50 PM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote: > ldp:Resource a rdfs:Class; > rdfs:comment """ > A HTTP resource whose state is represented in any way that conforms to the simple > lifecycle patterns and conventions in section 5. Linked Data Platform Resources. > """ . Why are there no rdfs:label relations? I ask because I see the same pattern throughout your suggestions i.e., comments but no labels. As I am sure you know, labels themselves can be an effective mechanism for discovering problems. They are also extremely helpful on the UI front re., Linked Data. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 20:19:04 UTC