Re: Creating members

I agree. Expanding the definition of LDP-BC and LDP-DC to cover creation 
makes sense.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:   Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
To:     public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
Date:   02/11/2014 08:36 AM
Subject:        Re: Creating members



Hi Arnaud:
Here is the situation as I see it:
1. All containers accept creation requests
2. For Basic Containers and Direct Containers the member is added based on 
the URI indicated in the request
3. For indirect Containers the member is added based on the content 
indicated in the request.

I'm saying that, in the definitions, we only make point 3 and not points 1 
and 2.
All the best, Ashok

On 2/10/2014 10:21 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
Ashok, 

The difference between Indirect Containers and the other types of 
container is not in the capacity of accepting creation requests, but in 
the capacity of accepting creation requests " that result in members being 
added based on the content of its contained documents rather than the URIs 
assigned to those documents." 

This is to address the case of non-information resources as described on 
the wiki: 
https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/index.php?title=Containers&oldid=3233#IndirectContainer

--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:        Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> 
To:        "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, 
Date:        02/10/2014 04:24 PM 
Subject:        Creating members 



The definition of LDP-IC says ... 




Linked Data Platform Indirect Container (LDP-IC) 
A LDPC that is similar to a LDP-DC and is capable of accepting creation 
requests that result in members being added based on the content of its 
contained documents rather than the URIs assigned to those documents. 

I may be reading this incorrectly but it seems to say that only LDP-ICs 
accept creation requests. 



Later in the document it says that all containers accept POST and perhaps 
PUT to create members.

Please clarify.
-- 
All the best, Ashok 

Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 16:58:47 UTC