- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:34:52 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5307C67C.1010703@oracle.com>
I agree with Sandro. We should try and get a clean membership/container story together before we go to LC2. All the best, Ashok On 2/21/2014 4:28 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On 02/21/2014 03:50 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: >> Here is the agenda for Monday's call: >> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.02.24 >> -- > > > Are we ready for LC2? > > -0 Personally, I think the container/membership story is extremely problematic, and we've come around to a place where we can do much better. But I'm not going to lie in the road, because: > > 1. We really do need to move along > > 2. Arnaud may be right there's nothing better nearby > > 3. Everyone can just use ldp:BasicContainer along with some new "Membership" thing, leaving the existing Membership stuff to the large pile of not-quite-deprecated stuff, like RDF Reification and RDF Bag. > > (This is assuming I don't notice any other problems.) > >> Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group >
Received on Friday, 21 February 2014 21:35:45 UTC