Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names

- Steve Speicher


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Roger Menday <
> roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> (snip)

>
>> Here is another example from the spec.
>>
>> "6.3.1 The representation of a LDPC must contain a set of membership
>> triples following one of the consistent patterns from that definition."
>>
>> I think in this case this should be containment triples ...
>>
>
> 6.3.1 seems right to me, containment triple pattern is fixed as: (LDPC,
> ldp:contains, LDPR)
>

Correction.  6.3.1 is the HTTP GET section in LDP Containers [1].  I
believe this is a place where we didn't properly catch a change for the new
resolution.

Perhaps rewritten as 2 rules such:
[[
6.3.1 The representation of a LDPC MUST include the containment triples.

6.3.2 The representation of a LDPC MUST include the  membership triples
following if the membership-constant-URI is the LDPC itself. (rest of
previous 6.3.1)
]]

[1] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#ldpc-HTTP_GET

- Steve

(snip)