- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:26:06 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <530B567E.9050806@openlinksw.com>
On 2/21/14 12:55 PM, Roger Menday wrote: > > hello Kingsley, > > Thanks for your feedback. > I would like to think about your diagramming suggestions over the > weekend. > But, I have a comment now on your point #2. > > My picture was the DirectContainer case. > Here, all the boxes are Documents. > So, there is nothing to change. > (for the IndirectContainer case, we *will* have other shapes in the > picture I beleive) > > However ... > > MembershipTriple's link non-informational resources and > ContainerTriple's link information resources. But, in > a DirectContainer, the Document which is created is the object > position of the membershipTriple. Therefore the membershipTriple is > linking to an Information resource, which is a contradiction. > > My conclusion is that we shouldn't really have DirectContainers ... > > ? > Roger Roger, I don't believe a document about "net worth" and what the term "net worth" denotes are one an the same, hence my suggestion about entity depictions. Naturally, I need a medium (e.g., a Web Document, Paper Document etc.) through which I perceive your "net worth" but that doesn't make the aforementioned perception medium (i.e., Document) the signifier (i.e., identifier) of your net worth. The eternal issue is that the perception medium (so called "information resource") and the signification mechanism (identifier) continue to be conflated. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 14:26:28 UTC