Saturday, 29 June 2002
Friday, 28 June 2002
- RE: Replacing the Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report
- RE: Replacing the Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report
- RE: Replacing the Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report
- RE: Replacing the Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report
- RE: resource-types of working resources/collections
- resource-types of working resources/collections
- RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in c ollection
- RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in c ollection
- RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in c ollection
- RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in c ollection
- error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in collection
Thursday, 27 June 2002
- RE: activity-set and new members of a working collection
- activity-set and new members of a working collection
Wednesday, 26 June 2002
- RE: Can there be multiple BINDs to a VCR?
- RE: Can there be multiple BINDs to a VCR?
- RE: versioned collections vs. delete on VHR
- RE: Can there be multiple BINDs to a VCR?
- Can there be multiple BINDs to a VCR?
- versioned collections vs. delete on VHR
Thursday, 20 June 2002
Wednesday, 19 June 2002
Sunday, 16 June 2002
- RFC3253 XML extensibility, was: LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
- RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
Saturday, 15 June 2002
- RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
- RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
- RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
- RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
- RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
- RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
- LABEL request only allows one set, one add...
Wednesday, 12 June 2002
- RE: version controlled collection feature, additional UNCHECKOUT semantics
- version controlled collection feature, additional UNCHECKOUT semantics
Thursday, 6 June 2002
- RE: CHECKOUT VCR with Label: header and DAV:auto-update
- CHECKOUT VCR with Label: header and DAV:auto-update
Wednesday, 5 June 2002
- RE: MOVE on Version History Members of a Working Collection
- RE: MOVE on Version History Members of a Working Collection
- RE: MOVE on Version History Members of a Working Collection
- MOVE on Version History Members of a Working Collection
- Re: question about Version-Control
- Re: question about Version-Control
- question about Version-Control
Wednesday, 29 May 2002
- RE: RFC 3253 issue vs. DAV:auto-update and working resources
- RE: Typo in RFC 3253, section 5.4.1
- RE: VCRs, working resources and locate-by-history
- RE: RFC 3253 issue vs. DAV:auto-update and working resources
Tuesday, 28 May 2002
Friday, 24 May 2002
Wednesday, 22 May 2002
Friday, 17 May 2002
- RE: Semantics of delete on a member of a working collection
- Semantics of delete on a member of a working collection
- RE: Problem: creation of a MS webfolder and length of DAV: header
- Problem: creation of a MS webfolder and length of DAV: header
Wednesday, 15 May 2002
- VCRs, working resources and locate-by-history
- RFC 3253 issue vs. DAV:auto-update and working resources
- Typo in RFC 3253, section 5.4.1
Tuesday, 7 May 2002
Friday, 3 May 2002
Monday, 29 April 2002
Sunday, 28 April 2002
Saturday, 27 April 2002
Friday, 26 April 2002
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- Antwort: Re: Antwort: RE: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
- Re: Antwort: RE: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
- Antwort: RE: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
- Re: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
- RE: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
- RE: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
Thursday, 25 April 2002
Wednesday, 24 April 2002
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- Re: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- Re: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
- RE: Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
Tuesday, 23 April 2002
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- Configuration/baseline reports
- Re: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- Problems with Windows XP "redirector" and Mac OS X WebDAVFS.
- Label: and Depth: header combination (was: RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1)
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
Monday, 22 April 2002
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Typo in RFC3253, section 3.1.4
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Typo in RFC3253, section 3.1.4
- Re: Typo in RFC3253, section 3.1.4
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- Typo in RFC3253, section 3.1.4
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- Re: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
- Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1
Sunday, 21 April 2002
- RE: Creation time of a version, Baseline-control stuff, diverse
- Creation time of a version, Baseline-control stuff, diverse
- RE: Creation time of a version.
Saturday, 20 April 2002
Friday, 19 April 2002
Thursday, 18 April 2002
- Typo in RFC 2518?
- RE: Creation time of a version.
- Properties registry
- RE: Creation time of a version.
- RE: Creation time of a version.
- RE: Creation time of a version.
- RE: Creation time of a version.
- RE: Creation time of a version.
- RE: Creation time of a version.
- Creation time of a version.
Tuesday, 16 April 2002
Monday, 15 April 2002
Friday, 12 April 2002
- RE: Re[2]: Semantic of MOVE between working collections
- RE: Re[2]: Semantic of MOVE between working collections
- RE: Copy and acl
- Copy and acl
- RE: Meaning of precondition DAV:supported-live-property
- RE: Comment and author for a new version.
Thursday, 11 April 2002
- RE: Meaning of precondition DAV:supported-live-property
- RE: Meaning of precondition DAV:supported-live-property
- Re: Meaning of precondition DAV:supported-live-property
- Meaning of precondition DAV:supported-live-property
- Comment and author for a new version.
Monday, 8 April 2002
- RE: Re[2]: Semantic of MOVE between working collections
- Re[2]: Semantic of MOVE between working collections
- RE: server defined activity URLs
- AW: server defined activity URLs
Saturday, 6 April 2002
- RE: Relative URLs, Multiple bindings
- RE: Semantic of MOVE between working collections
- RE: Missing preconditions for COPY and MOVE ?
- RE: Relative URLs, Multiple bindings
- RE: Missing preconditions for COPY and MOVE ?
- RE: Semantic of MOVE between working collections