- From: Tim Ellison <tim@ellison.name>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:12:18 +0100
- To: "Deltav WG" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Julian wrote: > "variant > A resource may have one, or more than one, representation(s) > associated with it at any given instant. Each of > these representations is termed a 'variant.' Use of the term > 'variant' does not necessarily imply that the resource > is subject to content negotiation." > > So any representation you can GET on a URI is a variant of this resource. Don't see how that follows. If you delete a version-controlled resource it does not delete the version resource -- they are different resources. > > If DeltaV implies that a version is a variant of a version-controlled > > resource then that must be fixed. > > I'd turn it around: if you strongly believe that a version should not be > considered a variant of a resource, then at least the label > header semantics must be removed from the spec. I see no reason why the label: header cannot be defined to 'redirect' the method to another resource. Regards, Tim
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 14:12:31 UTC