- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:59:59 -0400
- To: Edgar Schwarz <edgar@edgarschwarz.de>, Deltav WG <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
From: Edgar Schwarz [mailto:edgar@edgarschwarz.de] In 12.6.1 we see: BASELINE-CONTROL baseline-control href Shouldn't this be (See 12.6) ? BASELINE-CONTROL baseline-control baseline href Egads! It certainly should be. I'll add that to the Errata. Then I'm looking for some reports. First I would like to have information on a baseline. How can I get the list of versions and subbaselines ? To get the list of versions, do a PROPFIND Depth:Infinity on the DAV:baseline-collection of the baseline. To get the subbaselines, get the DAV:subbaseline-set property of the baseline. Second I want to have information on a configuration. This means state (checked-out, checked-in) and a list of VCRs, VCCs and their states. To get the DAV:checked-in and DAV:checked-out properties of the configuration, just PROPFIND the DAV:version-controlled-configuration of any member of the configuration for those two properties. What list of VCR's did you have in mind? If it is all the VCR's that are the member of the configuration, just PROPFIND Depth:Infinity the root collection of the configuration for DAV:checked-in and DAV:checked-out (any resource that has these properties is a VCR that is a member of the configuration). By VCC, did you mean VCCn or VCCl? I also twice read negative things on WebDAV recently. It was considered a security risk. But it wasn't clear whether WebDAV itself was the target or faulty implementations. I hope ACL (which I didn't have the time to follow) will cure these problems. These were negative comments about WebDAV appear to be derived from a basic misunderstanding of the WebDAV design. In particular, they appear to assume WebDAV suffers from the same security problems as protocols like SOAP that tunnel through POST. WebDAV was specifically designed to not have these problems (at non-trivial cost, since the secure approach adopted by WebDAV creates problems with non-HTTP/1.1 compliant proxies), so it is rather frustrating for WebDAV to be incorrectly singled out, instead of the protocols (like SOAP) that in fact do have these problems. Several of us have sent messages to the authors of these incorrect statements, and hopefully they will be retracted. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2002 19:00:48 UTC