RE: checked-out version-controlled configuration

I agree it is a bug, but I believe the bug is
having checked-out version-controlled resource
and checked-out version-controlled configuration
categories.

We should have just defined version-controlled
resource to inherit from checked-out resource
and directly introduce the checked-in properties
and methods to version-controlled resource,
and deleted the checked-out vcr and checked-out vcc
categories.

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:tim@ellison.name]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:24 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: RE: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none>


I agree, this is a bug.

I'll start an errata page and post it on the delta-v website.

Thanks
Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Zivkov, Sasa
> Sent: 15 April 2002 14:25
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: [ietf-dav-versioning] <none>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> in RFC3253, A.18 Checked-Out Version-Controlled Configuration the
> supported methods are defined as:
> 
> 	-  all version-controlled configuration methods.
> 
> In this case it looks like, for example, CHECKIN method is not supported
> by a checked-out versin-controlled configuration.
> 
> I think that what is missing here is:
> 	-  all checked-out version controlled resource methods.
> 
> Regards
> Sasha

Received on Saturday, 20 April 2002 16:16:28 UTC