- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:00:47 +0200
- To: "Lisa Dusseault" <ldusseault@xythos.com>, "'Clemm, Geoff'" <gclemm@rational.com>, "'DeltaV \(E-mail\)'" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Lisa, I think the usage of "ANY" is intentional (for RFC3253). The wording just states what DAV's XML enxtensibilty rules require -- the DAV:label element may contain a sequence of arbitrary elements, of which there may be only one DAV:add, DAV:set or DAV:remove element. > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 4:10 PM > To: 'Clemm, Geoff'; 'DeltaV (E-mail)' > Subject: RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add... > > > > That's a great point, but it makes me realize I may be reading the > definition wrong. I had assumed it to be possible to add one > label, remove > a second and set a third, all in the same request. This > assumption was based > on the following language: > > The request body MUST be a DAV:label element. > > <!ELEMENT label ANY> > ANY value: A sequence of elements with at most one DAV:add, > DAV:set, or DAV:remove element. > > Perhaps this is supposed to mean that only one child element can be inside > label, but "a sequence" does imply more than one. If you mean to restrict > it to one only, then the definition should be: > > <!ELEMENT label (add | set | remove)> > > Lisa > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:24 PM > > To: DeltaV (E-mail) > > Subject: RE: LABEL request only allows one set, one add... > > > > > > > > I wouldn't say it was an oversight, but rather a use > > case that wasn't sufficiently common to warrant making > > the protocol more complicated to support it. > > In particular, you would have to define the semantics > > of what would happen if one part of the request would fail > > and the other would succeed, and how to marshall that > > error information. > > > > Cheers, > > Geoff > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:ldusseault@xythos.com] > > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:31 PM > > To: DeltaV (E-mail) > > Subject: LABEL request only allows one set, one add... > > > > > > > > > > Is it an oversight that the LABEL request only allows one > > set, one add, or > > one remove at a time (or one of each, but not two of any?) > > > > For example, say I wanted to add <label-name>foo</label-name> and > > <label-name>bar</label-name> to a version in one request. > > The definition of > > the LABEL request body is: > > > > <!ELEMENT label ANY> > > ANY value: A sequence of elements with at most one > > DAV:add, DAV:set, or DAV:remove element. > > > > <!ELEMENT add (label-name)> > > <!ELEMENT set (label-name)> > > <!ELEMENT remove (label-name)> > > > > <!ELEMENT label-name (#PCDATA)> PCDATA value: string > > > > Since <add> can only contain one label-name, only one label > > can be added per > > each request. I would have to issue two LABEL requests to > > add both foo and > > bar labels. > > > > Lisa > > > >
Received on Saturday, 15 June 2002 13:00:51 UTC