- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:35:27 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: B H, Girish [mailto:g.b.h@sap.com]
From: Konstantin Knizhnik [mailto:KKnizhnik@togetherlab.com]
So, PROPFIND with DEPTH=1 for working collection will return
set of version histories, not VCR, right?
From: Clemm, Geoff [mailto:gclemm@rational.com]
Right.
If I understand this correct, then a PROPFIND with DEPTH=1 on the
working collection /repo/wr/wr1 would return the URL: /repo/vh/vh1
No, it would return "/repo/wr/wr1/xxx (where xxx is the binding name
from the DAV:versioned-binding-set for /repo/vh/vh1 in the collection
version that was checked out). Both /repo/wr/wr1/xxx and /repo/vh/vh1
identify the same resource, but the PROPFIND on /repo/wr/wr1 must
return the first URL.
However, in another thread ("Relative URLs, Multiple Bindings") you
replied
that URLs returned must be relative to the parent. To quote:
"My reading of 2518 is that it MUST return URLs that are relative to
the parent (e.g. A/B/x and A/B/y)."
Do we have a contradiction here or am I missing out something.
The latter (:-).
Cheers,
Geoff
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 13:36:03 UTC