- From: Tim Ellison <tim@ellison.name>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:27:33 +0100
- To: "Deltav WG" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> while by Tim's interpretation, the recursion would be:
>
> method ( resource, label, depth )
> {
> method (resource, label, 0);
> if (depth != 0) {
> foreach_internalmember(member, resource, label) {
> method ( resource, label, depth-1 ) } } }
In fact I wouldn't consider the label header at all on member resources...
method ( resource, label, depth )
{
method (resource, label, 0);
if (depth != 0) {
foreach_internalmember(member, resource) {
method ( resource, null, depth-1 ) } } }
> I believe my interpretation is more straightforward,
> and produces more predictable results.
No, no, _mine_ is more straight forward (one label look-up) -- is just as
predictable -- and returns a multistatus that can be easily groked.<g>
Regards,
Tim
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 14:27:40 UTC