- From: Tim Ellison <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:49:22 +0100
- To: "Deltav WG" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
"Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> wrote: > given a collection "/a" and a VCR "/a/b", where "/a/b" has a version > "/versions/b/1" with a label "labeltest", what would I expect from a > > PROPFIND /a > Depth: 1 > Label: labeltest > > ? > > According to section 8, the label header should only be applied when the > request URL is a VCR (which isn't the case here). However, a > > PROPFIND /a/b > Depth: 0 > Label: labeltest > > *would* take the label header into account. > > This would make the PROPFIND results for /a/b depend on which is the request > URL for the PROPFIND, which definitively doesn't seem to be desirable. > > (A similar problem applies to COPY with depth > 0). Your interpretation is correct. The label: header is only applied to the request-URL. Why is this undesirable? Regards, Tim
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 08:50:28 UTC