"field of use restrictions"
"field of use"
"royalty-free" or "RF" patent policy
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Against royalty free proposition
Bravo!
Comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-patent-policy-20021114
comment on patent policy
Comment on royalty-free patent policy
Comment regarding the Royalty-Free License policy at W3C proposal
Comment to W3C Patent Policy
Comments on latest revision
Comments on the 14 November last call draft
Compliance with GPL
CONGRATS on a reasonable (royalty-free) policy for W3 standards.
Delighted!
Draft from Patent Policy Working Group
Dropping RAND support is Excellent
Fanstasic!
- Turlif (Thursday, 14 November)
Field of use restrictions
Field of Use Restrictions Prevent Free Software Participation
Firm Changes Mind on SOAP Patent
Free internet
Free software and patents
good decision on royalties
I agree with FSF about "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy
I Disaprove past decisions over "RF" patents
I favor a royality free policy
Implementation of W3C standards as Free Software
Keep the standards free
Mostly minor comments on 14 Nov 2002 Patent Policy
No field of use
NO imposition of "field of use"
No patents is the right thing to do
Opposition to RF patent policy
patent policy
Patent policy - "field of use"
Patent policy comment
Patent policy draft
Patent Policy Working Group Royalty-Free Patent Policy
patent problems with last call
patent sux !
patent-policy
Patents
patents in the standards
Patents must be royalty free
Please keep the draft patent policy
position change on RAND
PPWG RF Patent Policy
Prohibit the "field of use" restriction
prohibit the imposition of "field of use"
prohibit the imposition of "field of use" restrictions
prohibit the imposition of "field of use" restrictions on patent
Proposed patent policy
Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy
RAND Licensing
- Tres (Thursday, 21 November)
RAND patents and web standards, bad idea
Regarding patents in w3c specifications...
Restrictive Patent Usage
- Dan Kegel (Friday, 29 November)
- Federico Heinz (Friday, 29 November)
- Dan Kegel (Friday, 29 November)
- Federico Heinz (Thursday, 28 November)
- Dan Kegel (Thursday, 28 November)
- Federico Heinz (Thursday, 28 November)
- Dan Kegel (Thursday, 28 November)
- Federico Heinz (Thursday, 28 November)
- Dan Kegel (Thursday, 28 November)
- Federico Heinz (Thursday, 28 November)
- Dan Kegel (Thursday, 28 November)
- Dan Kegel (Wednesday, 27 November)
- tompoe@renonevada.net (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Michael Pacey (Tuesday, 26 November)
- tompoe@renonevada.net (Tuesday, 26 November)
- coriordan@compsoc.com (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Dan Kegel (Tuesday, 26 November)
- coriordan@compsoc.com (Tuesday, 26 November)
RF is the right way to be RAND
RF patent policy
RF patents: I think that the FSF is right.
Royalty free patent policy...
Royalty free patents
- IAK (Thursday, 28 November)
Royalty Free Patents, Standards and Free Software
Royalty Free Patents.
Royalty Free W3C Specification
Royalty-free approach
royalty-free patent policy
Royalty-free patent policy last-call draft
royalty-free patents
royalty-free w3c
- Tig (Thursday, 14 November)
Royalty-Free Web Standards
Standards shoud be royalty free!
Stick to Royalty-free policy
Summary of 11 November 2002 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference
Summary of 28 October 2002 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference
Summary of 4 November 2002 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference
Support for a Royalty-Free Patent Policy
Support for RF patent policy
support for royalty-free standards
Support for the Royalty-Free Patent Policy
support RF
W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy
W3C Patent Policy
W3C patent policy comment
W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy
WD-patent-policy-20021114
Web standards!
You have saved w3
Your patent policy
Last message date: Saturday, 30 November 2002 12:16:07 UTC