w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from March 1997 by author

Alan Karben

• Re: How to put XML on the Web (Tuesday, 25 March)
• real-world XML link exercise (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: How to put XML on the Web (Monday, 24 March)
• Terminology in XML-Link Draft (Monday, 17 March)

Alex Milowski

• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• XML at www.w3.org (Monday, 3 March)

altheim

• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)

altheim@jurassic.Eng.Sun.COM

• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Tuesday, 4 March)

Arjun Ray

• Re: HTML/XML: the schism? (Wednesday, 26 March)

Bill Smith

• Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)

C M Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: Two more points for cleanup in existing draft (Friday, 21 March)

Christopher R. Maden

• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Wednesday, 19 March)
• SGML Forum of NY: 13 March (Monday, 17 March)
• Stylesheet association (Wednesday, 12 March)
• 5 March XML-link comments (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)

Dave Hollander

• Re: HTML/XML, le schisme? (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: 4.1 Address types (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address (Thursday, 6 March)

Dave Peterson

• Re: Name groups in ELEMENT and ATTLIST Decls (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!) (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Monday, 3 March)

David Durand

• Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Apologies to Lee (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (2 cc's deleted) (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Re Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: another vote for spans (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals? (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: clarification re. tokens (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 7. Attribute remapping? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 5.1 Extended Link Groups (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.6 Query Language Locators? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.3 SGML addressing (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.d Compulsory locator language(s)? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!) (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.4 URL processing (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.1 Address types (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.b Links pointing at links? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.3 SGML addressing (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ERB work on 3.* (Linking Elements) issues (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: LABEL attributes (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Saturday, 1 March)

Deborah A. Lapeyre

• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)

Derek Denny-Brown

• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Monday, 3 March)

Digitome Ltd.

• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Friday, 21 March)

Eve L. Maler

• Re: Terminology in XML-Link Draft (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: XML marketing contributions (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Kind of surprising commercial XML application (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 7. Attribute remapping? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: LABEL attributes (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Monday, 3 March)

Eve Maler

• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Sunday, 2 March)

Gavin Nicol

• Re: ERB call on addressing (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: XML interchange (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: XML encoding names (Tuesday, 4 March)

Harvey Bingham

• Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: Kind of surprising commercial XML application (long) (Thursday, 6 March)

Henry S. Thompson

• &, %, Literals, QuotedCData (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Two more points for cleanup in existing draft (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: another vote for spans (Monday, 17 March)
• Addressing spans (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links (Monday, 3 March)

James Clark

• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Conditional sections (Saturday, 15 March)
• Attribute value normalization incompatibility (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• XML encoding names (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Sunday, 2 March)

Jean Paoli

• RE: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Techweb article (Tuesday, 18 March)

Joe English

• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.b Links pointing at links? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.3 SGML addressing (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Monday, 3 March)

John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu

• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Saturday, 8 March)

Jon Bosak

• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Wednesday, 26 March)
• WG meeting at WWW6 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• HTML/XML: the schism? (Saturday, 22 March)
• HTML/XML, le schisme? (Friday, 21 March)
• Japanese translation of the XML draft (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Archives updated; roster changed (Monday, 17 March)
• Japanese XML page (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML (Friday, 14 March)
• Microsoft bases two proposals on XML (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: XML Press Release (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Upcoming Journal Publishers XML Tutorial and Math Round Table (EPSIG) (Saturday, 8 March)
• RE: Bogus XML conformance claim (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Thursday, 6 March)
• Bogus XML conformance claim (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Kind of surprising commercial XML application (long) (Thursday, 6 March)
• XML in Infoworld (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: XML at www.w3.org (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Monday, 3 March)
• Call for WWW6 demos (Monday, 3 March)
• Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Saturday, 1 March)

Karl F. Best

• Re: XML marketing conference, San Diego (Thursday, 6 March)

Lauren Wood

• TechWeb article about XML (Tuesday, 18 March)

lee@sq.com

• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: Apologies to Lee (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to put XML on the Web (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs] (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs] (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Sunday, 16 March)
• Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: XML interchange [was Re: Stylesheet association] (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Spans, and an RFI (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Saturday, 8 March)

Len Bullard

• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: How to put XML on the Web (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: HTML/XML, le schisme? (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs] (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Re Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: XML interchange (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: XML interchange (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: XML Press Release (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: XML Press Release (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.b Links pointing at links? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Monday, 3 March)

Liora Alschuler

• WebWeek story (Friday, 28 March)

Lou Burnard

• clarification re. tokens (Monday, 10 March)
• another vote for spans (Monday, 10 March)

Martin Bryan

• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to put XML on the Web (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Transparent content negotiation pointers & status (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: How to put XML on the Web (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Saturday, 15 March)
• RE: another vote for spans (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (hum, hum!) (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!) (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.b Links pointing at links? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.a Can resources be plural? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.6 Query Language Locators? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.3 SGML addressing (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.1 Address types (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 7. Attribute remapping? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 5.1 Extended Link Groups (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.d Compulsory locator language(s)? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links (Sunday, 2 March)

Martin Pike

• Name groups in ELEMENT and ATTLIST Decls (Tuesday, 25 March)

Matthew Fuchs

• Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: HTML/XML: the schism? (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: HTML/XML, le schisme? (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Re Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)

Michael Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• draft proposal for catalog resolution (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Name groups in ELEMENT and ATTLIST Decls (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• the return of the Public Identifier Question (Wednesday, 19 March)

Murray Altheim

• Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Wednesday, 5 March)

Murray Maloney

• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs] (Tuesday, 18 March)
• XML Press Release (Tuesday, 11 March)

Norbert H. MIKULA

• Re: Character references in XML (Saturday, 22 March)
• Character references in XML (Saturday, 22 March)
• Start comment with <!--* or <--* (Friday, 21 March)

Norbert Mikula

• Re: Two more points for cleanup in existing draft (Friday, 21 March)

Paul Grosso

• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Friday, 28 March)
• public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs] (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Monday, 17 March)
• those predeclared entity refs (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Link draft: 5.2 location source (Wednesday, 12 March)
• XML interchange [was Re: Stylesheet association] (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Upcoming Journal Publishers XML Tutorial and Math Round Table (EPSIG) (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Upcoming Journal Publishers XML Tutorial and Math Round Table (EPSIG) (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: Link draft: 5.2 location source (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: Link draft: 5.5 TEI location reference type (Saturday, 8 March)
• Link draft: 3.2 extended link (Saturday, 8 March)

Paul Prescod

• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: AW: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Wednesday, 26 March)
• XML and Math (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to put XML on the Web (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Re Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Monday, 3 March)

Peter Flynn

• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Monday, 31 March)
• XML FAQ (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Two more points for cleanup in existing draft (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: FYI (Transliteration) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Name groups in ELEMENT and ATTLIST Decls (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: FPI resolution (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: HTML/XML, le schisme? (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• XML FAQ (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: FPI resolution (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• FPI resolution (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Conference in San Diego (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: XML interchange (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: XML Press Release (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators? (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Upcoming Journal Publishers XML Tutorial and Math Round Table (EPSIG) (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: 7. Attribute remapping? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Sunday, 2 March)

Peter Murray-Rust

• Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution (Monday, 31 March)
• XML-LINK questions (Monday, 31 March)
• PIs (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: The furore over PUBLIC (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: How to put XML on the Web (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html (Sunday, 23 March)
• Re: Character references in XML (Saturday, 22 March)
• Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Entity resolution (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators? (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators? (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: 4.4 URL processing (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 4.4 URL processing (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ERB work on 3.* (Linking Elements) (Sunday, 2 March)

Rivers-Moore, Daniel

• RE: another vote for spans (Tuesday, 11 March)

Robin Cover

• Re: XML Press Release (Tuesday, 11 March)

Sam Hunting

• furore over PUBLIC (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: 7. Attribute remapping? (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Sunday, 2 March)

Stephen Buswell

• XML & Math (Wednesday, 26 March)

Steve Pepper

• WG get-together in San Diego (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!) (Friday, 7 March)
• XML marketing conference, San Diego (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!) (Thursday, 6 March)
• Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!) (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Sunday, 2 March)
• ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Saturday, 1 March)

Steven J. DeRose

• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)

Terry Allen

• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: FPI resolution (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: FPI resolution (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Re Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)
• FYI: URN status (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Friday, 14 March)
• Incorrect Reply to Lee ["Associating"] (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: Stylesheet association (Wednesday, 12 March)
• Re: Link draft: 5.2 location source (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: 5.1 Extended Link Groups (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.1 Address types (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 7. Attribute remapping? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 4.a Can resources be plural? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links (Sunday, 2 March)

Tim Bray

• Re: ERB call on addressing (Friday, 28 March)
• The furore over PUBLIC (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• ERB Decisions of March 26th (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: those predeclared entity refs (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ERB call on addressing (Tuesday, 25 March)
• How to put XML on the Web (Monday, 24 March)
• ERB call on addressing (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• ERB reporting group (Monday, 17 March)
• ERB: decision and conundrum (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Conference in San Diego (Friday, 14 March)
• Recent ERB work - miscellaneous (Friday, 14 March)
• Recent ERB Work on URL addressing (Friday, 14 March)
• Spans, and an RFI (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: 4.4 URL processing (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.3 SGML addressing (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 5.1 Extended Link Groups (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.d Compulsory locator language(s)? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.b Links pointing at links? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.6 Query Language Locators? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.a Can resources be plural? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 7. Attribute remapping? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.1 Address types (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Updated/reorganized spec (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Kind of surprising commercial XML application (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: 4.a Can resources be plural? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 5.2 Linking element corrals? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 7. Attribute remapping? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 5.1 Extended Link Groups (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.6 Query Language Locators? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.b Links pointing at links? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.1 Address types (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.4 URL processing (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.3 SGML addressing (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.2 Location-source/Base address (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.a Can resources be plural? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.d Compulsory locator language(s)? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• 4.c Homegrown locator language? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Lotsa discussion items coming atcha (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: XML encoding names (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Sunday, 2 March)
• ERB work on 3.* (Linking Elements) issues (Sunday, 2 March)
• 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links (Sunday, 2 March)
• 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? (Sunday, 2 March)
• 3.2.a Name for generalized multilink (Sunday, 2 March)
• 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR (Sunday, 2 March)
• 3.1 b-h: LABEL attributes (Sunday, 2 March)
• 3.1 b-h: ROLE & LOCATOR attributes (Sunday, 2 March)
• 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? (Sunday, 2 March)
• 3.a List link required? (Sunday, 2 March)
• Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal (Sunday, 2 March)

Tom Magliery

• Re: HTML/XML: the schism? (Wednesday, 26 March)
• XML article in EC.COM (Friday, 14 March)

W. Eliot Kimber

• Re: ERB call on addressing (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Link draft: 5.2 location source (Sunday, 9 March)
• Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!) (Thursday, 6 March)

Weichel Bernhard (K3/EES4)

• AW: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization (Monday, 31 March)
• AW: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)
• AW: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th] (Monday, 31 March)

Yves Savourel

• RE: Bogus XML conformance claim (Thursday, 6 March)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 1997 22:22:56 UTC