- From: Sam Hunting <sgmlsh@CAM.ORG>
- Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 15:44:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: Steve Pepper <pepper@FALCH.NO>
- cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> In fact LINK is extremely simple. Its basic purpose is to allow us to
> separate and algorithmically associate structure and processing.
This sounds to me like a Good Thing, and precisely the sort of
"extensible" functionality that will enable XML's rapid adoption.
> If anyone wants to know *why* [I think] LINK is powerful, just
> ask. I will be happy to attempt a clear, concise and (hopefully) convincing
> explanation -- with XML-related examples.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A practical focus to this discussion would be welcome for at least this
reader. Please, Steve, go ahead. Also, you might consider cross-posting
the discussion to the xml developers list, so that the procedural
programmers can give their views on implementation.
Received on Sunday, 2 March 1997 15:44:20 UTC