At 21:51 29/03/97 -0800, you wrote: >[Peter Flynn:] > >| The point is that the data structure (the FPI) already exists, and >| people want to use it, even as a placeholder. > >Here's the problem. Most users who have expressed an opinion (this >includes myself) want public identifiers. But most implementors who >have expressed an opinion won't have anything to do with them until a >behavior is specified. That's perfectly understandable, and I have no problem with it. What I can't work out is why no-one's prepared even to propose a behaviour: it doesn't even have to be compulsory (pace Terry). Nothing ever stopped implementors jumping the gun and making up their own behaviours in the past: what's holding them back now? ///PeterReceived on Sunday, 30 March 1997 14:01:46 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:18 EDT