In message <3.0.32.19970304121746.00964160@pop.intergate.bc.ca> Tim Bray writes: > Very likely XML Link will use URLs (perhaps among things) for locators. > > Is this all we need to say? I think that presenting references as URLs (rather than SGML ID/IDREFs) is the best (and probably only) way to get the webheads (i.e. me) on board. I'm wondering what the role of ID/IDREF now is? Is it: - left semantically free so that SGMLheads can use in in whatever way they are used to - acting as a synonym for a simple case of xlink? - doing something significant but different? (if so I'm not clear what that is). > > Do we need specific interpretation of '#' fragment handling for XML? If we are requiring the target to be an ID, it needs spelling out. P. -- Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection Virtual School of Molecular Sciences http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/Received on Friday, 7 March 1997 17:28:00 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:14 EDT