W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > March 1997

Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question

From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 14:10:49 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199703211910.OAA16286@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
To: lee@sq.com
Cc: digitome@iol.ie, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> It occurs to me, in fact, that if we simply allow SYSTEM entries
> in our CATALOGs, and allow nothing else (except possibly DELEGATE or
> CATALOG entries??), we have no need for PUBLIC at all.
> 
> You get all the indirection you like.

So now *every* URL must be looked up in the catalog? And if we design a 
global resolution system then every URL must be looked up first in the global
resolution system (which could be several network messages) and then, on 
failure, is directly accessed? I prefer to call a spade a spade: public 
identifiers are designed to be looked up. They are not addresses. System
identifiers describe where something lives: they are addresses.

 Paul Prescod
Received on Friday, 21 March 1997 14:11:17 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:16 EDT