W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > March 1997

Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]

From: Sam Hunting <sgmlsh@CAM.ORG>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 18:32:26 -0500 (EST)
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.94.970329181700.13939A-100000@Stratus.CAM.ORG>
Terry Allen writes:

> There should be *no default
> assumed* by publishers.  That's hard to swallow, and most of 
> this group is choking on it; ask yourselves whether you need
> a specified default mechanism to find a copy of Moby Dick;
> ask yourselves whether, had Melville's publisher specified a
> default mechanism (e.g., writing to the publisher's address),
> you should have to follow it today.

When I ask myself the question, this is the answer:

In the example cited ("Moby Dick"), there is a well-proven system in
place, and both publishers and readers/buyers do indeed "follow it today."
It has two essential components: they are called the "title page" and the
"bibliography". 

The edition of Moby Dick contains a "title page", which contains both an
ISBN number (a unique identifier for the edition) and the bibliographical
information neecssary to uniquely identify the work -- title, author,
publisher, editor, date of publication, place of publication, etc. The
title page is used by authors/editors to construct a bibliography, a
mechanism users can employ to find "Moby Dick" at the library, the
bookstore, or the online bookseller. 

S.
Received on Saturday, 29 March 1997 18:32:20 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:18 EDT