At 13:06 4/3/97 -0500, David Durand wrote: >This seems to complicate the model, and isn't necessary if we have an >equivalent of BASE or LOCSRC. I would leave this out as being purely a >convenience feature unless we don't have an equivalent way to specify an >alternative addressing origin (or LOCSRC or base address or whatever you >want to call it) I thought LOCSRC had been dropped, which is partly why I suggested the alternative based on nesting. If locrsrc is there you don't need this concept of redirecting fragment references, though the labelling of groups of tags is still important. ---- Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 WWW home page: http://www.sgml.u-net.com/Received on Wednesday, 5 March 1997 04:08:56 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:11 EDT