public-ws-policy@w3.org from November 2006 by thread

Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 19 - 2006-12-06 Paul Cotton (Thursday, 30 November)

WSDL 1.1 element identifiers review Ashok Malhotra (Wednesday, 29 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3985 [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec Daniel Roth (Wednesday, 29 November)

ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion Daniel Roth (Wednesday, 29 November)

regrets from Toufic Boubez (by proxy) Maryann Hondo (Wednesday, 29 November)

Action Item re affects from nesting of policy assertions Tom Rutt (Monday, 27 November)

Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 18 - 2006-11-29 Christopher B Ferris (Monday, 27 November)

WSDL 1.1 element identifiers extensions, not defined David Orchard (Friday, 24 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3990 [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear Daniel Roth (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3989 [Guidelines] Suggested Format Asir Vedamuthu (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3988 [Guidelines] Section 8 Doesn't Illustrate How to Design an Assertion Asir Vedamuthu (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3987 [Guidelines] Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions? Asir Vedamuthu (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3986 [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? Asir Vedamuthu (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3984 [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs Asir Vedamuthu (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3983 [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently Asir Vedamuthu (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3981 [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design Asir Vedamuthu (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3980 [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy Asir Vedamuthu (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3982 [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors Daniel Roth (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: 3979 [Guidelines] Clarify the guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy Daniel Roth (Saturday, 18 November)

RE: NEW ISSUE: 3978 [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary Daniel Roth (Saturday, 18 November)

NEW ISSUE: [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary Daniel Roth (Saturday, 18 November)

Updated WSDL EI David Orchard (Wednesday, 15 November)

[VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 17 - 2006-11-15 Paul Cotton (Wednesday, 15 November)

Regrets for tomorrow Toufic Boubez (Wednesday, 15 November)

Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 17 - 2006-11-15 Paul Cotton (Tuesday, 14 November)

RE: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Gui delines and Primer) Prasad Yendluri (Monday, 13 November)

RE: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Gui delines and Primer) Prasad Yendluri (Monday, 13 November)

Editors Drafts Nov 9th ready David Orchard (Saturday, 11 November)

Updated wsd11elementidentifers David Orchard (Friday, 10 November)

NEW ISSUE 3966: Inconsistency in Primer re: PolicyReference Extensibility Monica J. Martin (Thursday, 9 November)

Concrete Proposal Around 3619 Glen Daniels (Thursday, 9 November)

On resolutions for 3721 and 3789 Felix Sasaki (Thursday, 9 November)

Rough draft of WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Note David Orchard (Thursday, 9 November)

NEW ISSUE 3965: Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute (primer) Fabian Ritzmann (Thursday, 9 November)

Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 Asir Vedamuthu (Wednesday, 8 November)

application/wspolicy+xml Philippe Le Hegaret (Wednesday, 8 November)

editorial bug in framework section 4.1 Tom Rutt (Wednesday, 8 November)

Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 Daniel Roth (Wednesday, 8 November)

discussion on 3619 Maryann Hondo (Tuesday, 7 November)

Proposed Resolution: 3599 and 3730 Asir Vedamuthu (Tuesday, 7 November)

[VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 16 - 2006-11-07 to 2006-11-09 Christopher B Ferris (Tuesday, 7 November)

Re: Policy alternatives (Was : Clarify usage...) Frederick Hirsch (Monday, 6 November)

Regrets for Tues William Henry (Monday, 6 November)

[VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 16 - 2006-11-07 to 2006-11-09 Christopher B Ferris (Monday, 6 November)

NEW ISSUE: Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains (guidelines) Frederick Hirsch (Saturday, 4 November)

NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) Frederick Hirsch (Saturday, 4 November)

Fourth Editors' Drafts Asir Vedamuthu (Friday, 3 November)

Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 16 - 2006-11-07 to 2006-11-09 Paul Cotton (Friday, 3 November)

Issue 3794 proposal Frederick Hirsch (Thursday, 2 November)

Re: Guidelines Document Frederick Hirsch (Thursday, 2 November)

ACTION-69 - Nov 3rd Editors' Drafts Asir Vedamuthu (Thursday, 2 November)

RE: [Bug 3793] Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities Paul Cotton (Wednesday, 1 November)

[VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 15 - 2006-11-01 Paul Cotton (Wednesday, 1 November)

Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral req uirements on the requester Sergey Beryozkin (Wednesday, 1 November)

Assertion guidelines new version Yalcinalp, Umit (Wednesday, 1 November)

Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester William Henry (Wednesday, 1 November)

Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Sergey Beryozkin (Tuesday, 31 October)

Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 William Henry (Wednesday, 1 November)

Editors Action 12 Resolution Asir Vedamuthu (Wednesday, 1 November)

RE: RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730 Asir Vedamuthu (Wednesday, 1 November)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 November 2006 23:39:59 UTC