W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > November 2006

Re: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer)

From: William Henry <william.henry@iona.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:22:45 -0700
Message-Id: <CD11638F-7D67-4C59-AAC7-9B4F823F6FE3@iona.com>
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org

Hi Frederick,

I think it's pretty obvious that if a requester sends a non-MTOM  
request it must be assumed that they are using the alternative -  
presumably whatever binding is specified in the binding. Then all  
exchanges between requester and provider will be with that  
alternative. If the requester uses MTOM then it is assumed that  
exchanges will be with the MTOM alternative.

I assume this is the same with security assertions two. Once using an  
alternative it is assumed that it will be used on all exchanges  
between that requester and provider.

Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 17:23:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:38:29 UTC