W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > November 2006

NEW ISSUE: 3981 [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:44:24 -0800
Message-ID: <1E0F0378382054439F14D5450650478F0B5447D1@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

Title: What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles' to policy
assertion design?

Description: The Guidelines document is for assertion authors. Section 4
describes the compact and normal forms for policy expressions. Compact
vs. normal form ('Authoring Styles') is not relevant to policy assertion
design. WS-Policy Primer describes the compact and normal forms for
policy expressions.

Justification: The Guidelines document should focus on guidelines for
policy assertion authors. 'Authoring Styles' is not in the minimum to
declare victory on the Guidelines document.

Target: Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors.

Proposal: Drop Section 4.


Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation
Received on Saturday, 18 November 2006 01:45:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:38:29 UTC