W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006

From: Sergey Beryozkin <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:56:49 -0000
Message-ID: <00fc01c70346$1e742270$3901020a@sberyoz>
To: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>, "Daniel Roth" <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Sorry, forgot to add. The statement that a provider is "lying" by saying 
<iona:hightlyThrouputtable wsp:optional="true" signedAndVerifiedBy=".."/>
is totally wrong IMHO...
The provider is saying that requesters may ignore this statement and this is what the Proposal1 was all about. Adding new attribute to differentiate between different shades of optionality will only complicate the issue.

Thanks, Sergey
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Sergey Beryozkin 
  To: Daniel Roth ; public-ws-policy@w3.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 2:52 PM
  Subject: Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006


  Hi

  I've read the text...

  It appears we'll have 

  wsp:optional="true"/false
  wsp:ignorable="true"/false

  Can someone please explain me what difference, from a requester's perspective these statements make :

  <MTOM wsp:optional="true">
  <MTOM wsp:ignorable="true">
  <MTOM wsp:ignorable="true" wsp:optional="false">
  <MTOM wsp:ignorable="false" wsp:optional="true">

  Thanks, Sergey


  ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Daniel Roth 
    To: public-ws-policy@w3.org 
    Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 2:04 PM
    Subject: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006


    Asir is having network problems, so I'm sending this on his behalf.

     

    Daniel Roth
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 14:55:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:43 GMT