W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > November 2006

RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers

From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:26:39 -0800
Message-ID: <2BA6015847F82645A9BB31C7F9D6416502AC41DA@uspale20.pal.sap.corp>
To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Cc: <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

+1 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
> Sent: Tuesday, Nov 14, 2006 4:24 PM
> To: Felix Sasaki; Ashok Malhotra
> Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers
> 
> 
> +1 to Ashok's wording, -1 to Felix's amendment.
> 
> I think the document very specifically defines a syntax.  It does not
> "propose" a syntax.  Whether the defined syntax is recommended or just
> acknowleged or of moderate historical interest, or whatever 
> is separate
> from what the contents of the document does.   
> 
> The status of the document is the thing that determines the
> "Recommendation" or "Note"ness of the "definition".  
> 
> Let's not push the status of the document into the contents.  That way
> leads to madness - like "notes" only containing Shoulds and 
> never Musts,
> etc.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:41 PM
> > To: Ashok Malhotra
> > Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Updated wsd11elementidentifers
> > 
> > 
> > Ashok Malhotra wrote:
> > > Dave:
> > > I have made a few comments in the attached Word document.
> > 
> > On "Reword Abstract to read:"
> > "This note defines a syntax to identify individual elements 
> in a WSDL
> > 1.1 document."
> > This is a bit confusing: a W3C Working Group Note has not the 
> > "normative power" to define something. I'd propose to replace 
> > "defines" with "proposes".
> > 
> > Felix
> > 
> > > There are also minor reference glitches etc. which I have 
> > not mentioned.
> > > Let me know if you want me to make the changes.
> > > 
> > > All the best, Ashok
> > >  
> > > 
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> > >> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> David Orchard
> > >> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:41 AM
> > >> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> > >> Subject: Updated wsd11elementidentifers
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> At
> > >> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11eleme
> > >> ntidentifi
> > >> ers.html
> > >>
> > >> I did a bunch of the updates that were mentioned in the meeting:
> > >>
> > >> 1. added mention of diff from wsdl2.0 component ids vs 
> > element ids 2. 
> > >> moved example URIs into sample doc 3. fixed typos in table
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Dave
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 00:27:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:43 GMT