W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Updated wsd11elementidentifers

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:34:51 +0900
Message-ID: <455B41AB.1040002@w3.org>
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, public-ws-policy@w3.org

David Orchard wrote:
> +1 to Ashok's wording, -1 to Felix's amendment.
> 
> I think the document very specifically defines a syntax.  It does not
> "propose" a syntax.  Whether the defined syntax is recommended or just
> acknowleged or of moderate historical interest, or whatever is separate
> from what the contents of the document does.   
> 
> The status of the document is the thing that determines the
> "Recommendation" or "Note"ness of the "definition".  
> 
> Let's not push the status of the document into the contents.  That way
> leads to madness - like "notes" only containing Shoulds and never Musts,
> etc.

Actually I also wanted to convince you to get rid of "normative
references" ... but this is of minor importance, so I'll drop it.

Felix

> 
> Cheers,
> Dave 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
>> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:41 PM
>> To: Ashok Malhotra
>> Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Updated wsd11elementidentifers
>>
>>
>> Ashok Malhotra wrote:
>>> Dave:
>>> I have made a few comments in the attached Word document.
>> On "Reword Abstract to read:"
>> "This note defines a syntax to identify individual elements in a WSDL
>> 1.1 document."
>> This is a bit confusing: a W3C Working Group Note has not the 
>> "normative power" to define something. I'd propose to replace 
>> "defines" with "proposes".
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>> There are also minor reference glitches etc. which I have 
>> not mentioned.
>>> Let me know if you want me to make the changes.
>>>
>>> All the best, Ashok
>>>  
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
>>>> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
>>>> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:41 AM
>>>> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
>>>> Subject: Updated wsd11elementidentifers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At
>>>> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11eleme
>>>> ntidentifi
>>>> ers.html
>>>>
>>>> I did a bunch of the updates that were mentioned in the meeting:
>>>>
>>>> 1. added mention of diff from wsdl2.0 component ids vs 
>> element ids 2. 
>>>> moved example URIs into sample doc 3. fixed typos in table
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
> 
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 17:08:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:43 GMT