Arthur Barstow
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-50 (Directors-Calls): If LC and CR are combined, Director's Calls can be excessive overhead [Processes that Suck e.g. too much time, resources, make work, etc.] (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: [TR] Status Section Requirements (Thursday, 31 October)
- LC-TRprocess-20131024#last-call "complex documents" is too subjective (Thursday, 31 October)
- LC-TRprocess-20131024#last-call point #2 needs clarification (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: Are Director's Calls mandatory for LCCR? (Thursday, 31 October)
- Are Director's Calls mandatory for LCCR? (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: [TR] Status Section Requirements (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: Revisions to Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 21 October (Monday, 21 October)
- Re: Going public: AB process Chapter 7 task force (Thursday, 10 October)
- Re: What about CGs? re Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: What about CGs? re Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: What about CGs? re Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions (Thursday, 3 October)
- What about CGs? re Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions (Thursday, 3 October)
Charles McCathie Nevile
- Re: LCCR is a silly name (Wednesday, 30 October)
- Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 28 October (Sunday, 27 October)
- Re: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal] (Saturday, 26 October)
- New draft, minutes of the Chapter 7 Task Force (Thursday, 24 October)
- Pushed proposed Ch 7 "LC draft" (Tuesday, 22 October)
- Re: small comment on the AB draft process document (Tuesday, 22 October)
- Re: Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Saturday, 19 October)
- Re: Going public: AB process Chapter 7 task force (Saturday, 19 October)
- Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Saturday, 19 October)
- Re: Changes to classes of changes? (Friday, 18 October)
- New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 21 October (Friday, 18 October)
- in situ (or not) changes Re: small comment on the AB draft process document (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: small comment on the AB draft process document (Friday, 18 October)
- Status and "Proposed Recommendation" Re: small comment on the AB draft process document (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: small comment on the AB draft process document (Thursday, 17 October)
- Re: small comment on the AB draft process document (Wednesday, 16 October)
- Re: Going public: AB process Chapter 7 task force (Friday, 11 October)
- Re: Suggested change to Revised Public Working Drafts section (Wednesday, 9 October)
- New Editor's draft, Chapter 7 (Wednesday, 9 October)
- Re: Errata and Edited Recommendation [ISSUE-45] (Wednesday, 9 October)
- Re: Suggested change to Revised Public Working Drafts section (Wednesday, 9 October)
- Re: Errata and Edited Recommendation (Wednesday, 9 October)
- Going public: AB process Chapter 7 task force (Wednesday, 9 October)
- Re: Suggested change to Revised Public Working Drafts section (Wednesday, 9 October)
- Re: Errata and Edited Recommendation (Wednesday, 9 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-44 (MinorUpdateNoNewReview): Process should be clear that minor edits at same level do not trigger new review period (Wednesday, 9 October)
- Re: New Editor's draft of Chapter 7 (Monday, 7 October)
- New Editor's draft of Chapter 7 (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7 (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7 (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7 (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7 (Thursday, 3 October)
Chris Lilley
Chris Wilson
Coralie Mercier
David Singer
- Re: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal] (Saturday, 26 October)
- Re: Revisions to Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Monday, 21 October)
- Re: Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Saturday, 19 October)
- Re: Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Saturday, 19 October)
- Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal] (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: Going public: AB process Chapter 7 task force (Thursday, 17 October)
fantasai
- [TR] Substantive Change (Thursday, 31 October)
- [TR] Editorial wrt Maturity Levels (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: [TR] Status Section Requirements (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: [TR] Status Section Requirements (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: [TR] Status Section Requirements (Thursday, 31 October)
- [TR] Status Section Requirements (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal] (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal] (Wednesday, 30 October)
- LCCR is a silly name (Wednesday, 30 October)
Ian Jacobs
- Re: Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Saturday, 19 October)
- Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Friday, 18 October)
- Comments re 7.6.2 and LCCR [Was: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal] (Friday, 18 October)
- Changes to classes of changes? (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: small comment on the AB draft process document (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: small comment on the AB draft process document (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-47 (in situ TR changes): What kind of changes can be "silently" made to a document in /TR [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 18 October)
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7 (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: What about CGs? re Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7 (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: What about CGs? re Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions (Thursday, 3 October)
- Re: What about CGs? re Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions (Thursday, 3 October)
Ivan Herman
Jeff Jaffe
Marcos Caceres
Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Ralph Swick
Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
- w3process-ISSUE-50 (Directors-Calls): If LC and CR are combined, Director's Calls can be excessive overhead [Processes that Suck e.g. too much time, resources, make work, etc.] (Thursday, 31 October)
- ISSUE-49: Links in chapter 7 ed don't work e.g. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ab/raw-file/default/tr.html#moztocid983157 (Monday, 21 October)
- w3process-ISSUE-48 (status of provisionally approved Rec): Status of this document requirements for Provisionally vs formally approved W3C Recommendations [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 18 October)
- w3process-ISSUE-47 (in situ TR changes): What kind of changes can be "silently" made to a document in /TR [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Thursday, 17 October)
- w3process-ISSUE-46 (explain heartbeat-only): Publish and explain if 6 months pass with no change [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 9 October)
- w3process-ISSUE-45 (fix all the erratas): Is the requirement that all errata should be addressed in an edited Recommendation too strong? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 9 October)
- w3process-ISSUE-44 (MinorUpdateNoNewReview): Process should be clear that minor edits at same level do not trigger new review period (Wednesday, 9 October)
- w3process-ISSUE-43 (edited rec: transition?): Does publishing an edited Recommendation require meeting all "state transition" requirements? (Thursday, 3 October)
- w3process-ISSUE-42 (Patent Policy refs): Accurate and clear references to the Patent Policy (Thursday, 3 October)
- w3process-ISSUE-41 (Reviewing corrections): Remove the "Review of corrections" process? (Thursday, 3 October)
Stephen Zilles
- RE: [TR] Status Section Requirements (Thursday, 31 October)
- RE: Are Director's Calls mandatory for LCCR? (Thursday, 31 October)
- Re: Are Director's Calls mandatory for LCCR? (Thursday, 31 October)
- RE: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal] (Wednesday, 30 October)
- No meeting of the Process Document Task Force is planned for Nov 4 or Nov 11 (Monday, 28 October)
- Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 28 October (Sunday, 27 October)
- Draft Last Call letter for the revision of Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document (Monday, 21 October)
- RE: Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal (Monday, 21 October)
- Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 21 October (Thursday, 17 October)
- RE: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal] (Monday, 14 October)
- Re: Going public: AB process Chapter 7 task force (Friday, 11 October)
- RE: New Editor's draft of Chapter 7 (Monday, 7 October)
Sylvain Galineau
Tim Berners-Lee
Wayne Carr
Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 23:20:17 UTC