W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2013

w3process-ISSUE-46 (explain heartbeat-only): Publish and explain if 6 months pass with no change [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:17:31 +0000
Message-Id: <E1VU30V-0006WX-OT@shauna.w3.org>
To: public-w3process@w3.org
w3process-ISSUE-46 (explain heartbeat-only): Publish and explain if 6 months pass with no change [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/46

Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile
On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)

Chris Lilley in email[1] proposed that the default criterion for a new draft should be when there are significant changes that would benefit from review (was already a criteria), and seperating the "should publish every 6 months" criterion, adding a "should explain why nothing changed" if nothing changed in 6 months.
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 23:17:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC