W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [TR] Status Section Requirements

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:11:17 -0700
Message-ID: <5272C775.90304@inkedblade.net>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
CC: W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 10/31/2013 04:30 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> My vote on the issues you raise above would be to move this entire
> section to a separate `TR publication process` type document with musts,
> suggestions, best practices, etc. that can be easily updated if/when the
> tide changes, as well as give the producers of the doc some flexibility.

+1 I would love for publication requirements to be a separate doc.
Particularly as I would like to completely overhaul the spec
template sometime soon. :)

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 21:11:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC