W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2013

w3process-ISSUE-45 (fix all the erratas): Is the requirement that all errata should be addressed in an edited Recommendation too strong? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 21:22:56 +0000
Message-Id: <E1VU1Dc-0003Wv-Hy@shauna.w3.org>
To: public-w3process@w3.org
w3process-ISSUE-45 (fix all the erratas): Is the requirement that all errata should be addressed in an edited Recommendation too strong? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/45

Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile
On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)

This issue was raised by Chris Lilley in email [1].

The basic question is whether it is important to clarify that while a group should address all errata before proposing an edited recommendation, they may propose an edited recommendation while there are outstanding errata in order to provide an improvement in the current Recommendation rather than an unnecessary dealy while the strive for perfection.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Oct/thread.html#msg21
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 21:23:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC