W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:33:50 -0500
Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-Id: <689569A1-F099-4AEB-B50D-A7C0D9A988F9@w3.org>
To: "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>

On Oct 3, 2013, at 3:52 PM, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> This addresses the last of the pieces in your email.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:11:23 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> * 7.2.3. "Worthy ideas should be recorded even when not incorporated
>>   into a mature document." Suggest instead:
>> 
>>    "The Working Group SHOULD record substantive proposals even when
>>    not incorporated into a mature document."
>> 
>>   First idea is to identify the subject. Also, "worthy" sounds a bit
>>   to judgmental to my ear. But I don't feel too strongly about it.
> 
> I got
> 
> "Working Groups should record substantive or interesting proposals raised by reviews but not incorporated into a current specification."

Sounds fine. Thanks.

Ian

> 
> cheers
> 
> -- 
> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
>      chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                                          +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 20:33:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC