W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:20:30 -0700
Message-id: <9ED21E69-4970-465D-A6B6-D2E55E3FB112@apple.com>
Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
I think a name will help both inside the group, and outside.  Groups are required to heartbeat WDs, and it's notable when they say, by way of a label "this one is different, we are done and need wide review".

The process need only suggest a name, since there are no formal process actions tied to it.  But the newsletters can say WG xxx has produced an Ultimate Review of Buttons and Bows, and so on.

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 18, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> 
> "Please review, because we're about to go into LCCR" seems OK to me. Why have a formal "almost LCCR" stage name?
Received on Saturday, 19 October 2013 01:22:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC