Andrea Perego
Annette Greiner
- Re: Enrichment document (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: Enrichment document (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: Enrichment document (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: Document updated with raised issues before publishing it (Friday, 19 June)
- reviewing the BP doc (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call — Best Practices publication (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: General feedback on the document (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: General feedback on the document (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-167 (Date & Numeric formats): DCAT lacking in date, time and number formats [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Agenda for Friday - 5jun (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: data quality vocabulary - scope (Wednesday, 3 June)
Antoine Isaac
- Re: Publications live (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: Enrichment document (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: DQV Comments (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: Suggestion for context section (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: Suggestion for context section (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: DQV Comments (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: DQV Comments (Friday, 19 June)
- Re: DQV Comments (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: comments on DUV and some proposals (Sunday, 7 June)
- Re: data quality vocabulary - scope (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: data quality vocabulary - scope (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: data quality vocabulary - dimensions (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: New DQV editor's draft (Tuesday, 2 June)
Bart van Leeuwen
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
- Re: reviewing the BP doc (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: reviewing the BP doc (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: Publications live (Thursday, 25 June)
- Re: Coincidentally... (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Re: DUV FPWD (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: DUV FPWD (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: comments on Data on the Web Best Practices (Monday, 22 June)
- Re: DUV FPWD (Monday, 22 June)
- Re: DUV FPWD (Monday, 22 June)
- Re: BP doc ready for 2015-06-25 (Monday, 22 June)
- Re: BP document - 2nd draft is ready to be published (Monday, 22 June)
- Re: Suggestion for context section (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: comments on Data on the Web Best Practices (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: comments on DUV and some proposals (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: My comments on DUV (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Minor changes suggested for BP (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-167 (Date & Numeric formats): DCAT lacking in date, time and number formats [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: General feedback on the document (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Minor changes suggested for BP (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Minor changes suggested for BP (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: comments on Data on the Web Best Practices (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: BPs on Data Identification (Friday, 5 June)
Carlos Iglesias
Caroline Burle
Christophe Guéret
- Re: Publications live (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call (Friday, 26 June)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's DWBP Call - vote on next PWD of BP Doc (Friday, 19 June)
- Reply to comments on the document (Thursday, 18 June)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: Minor changes suggested for BP (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: Minor changes suggested for BP (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: General feedback on the document (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: comments on DUV and some proposals (Friday, 5 June)
- Re: New DQV editor's draft (Wednesday, 3 June)
Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
- dwbp-ISSUE-196 (annette_g): Data enrichment [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 19 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-195 (annette_g): Provide data up to date [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 19 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-194 (annette_g): Data Identification [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 19 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-193 (annette_g): Data Versioning [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 19 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-192: How to represent the relationship between a dataset and its different versions? Is PAV a good solution to track dataset versioning? [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 18 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-191: Backward compatibility with DAQ and Data Cube [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-190: "official" DQV reqs vs the implementation of our best practices (cf. the "5 stars" thread). [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-189: Aether VoID extension uses a different from the pattern that DQV inherits from DAQ [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-188: Section "Express the quality of a linkset" will be completed by examples coming from Riccardo's work on measuring the quality of linksets between SKOS concept schemes [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-187: Do we want to keep the same occurrence constraints as defined in DAQ (for example, that every metric should belong to exactly one dimension)? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-186: There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly. [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-185: dqv:QualityAnnotation modeling issues [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-183: We may want to consider a revision of DCAT to make dcat:Dataset and dcat:Distribution subclasses of prov:Entity [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-182: The label of daq:QualityGraph does not fit well with the current model [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-181: Should we have only the existing class daq:QualityGraph or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-180: Are we actually allowed by W3C to re-use elements from DAQ? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-179: The Working Group is considering to put all new classes and properties (together with the ones of the Data Usage Vocabulary) in the DCAT namespace. [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-178: The definition of duv:Feedback needs to be reviewed because it is not clear if it should be a subclass of oa:Annotation or just an instance of oa:Motivation. [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-177: Should duv:consumes be used instead of duv:consumed? Should we be able to reify Consumption? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-176: Should prov:SoftwareAgent be used instead of Application/WebOfThing? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-175: Shouldn't duv:DatasetCorrection be a dcat:Dataset as well? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-174: The meaning of duv:retains is not clear. More examples should be provided and its use should be reviewed. [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-173: The use of cito:CitationAct and duv:Citation should be reviewed. [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-172: Should duv:generates be removed? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-171: Should dct:creator or doap:developer be used instead of duv:developedBy? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-170: Should we use Software or earl:Software instead of duv:Application? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-169: Should usage be specified at the Dataset or Distribution level? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-168 (Dataset versioning): Dataset versioning [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 11 June)
- dwbp-ISSUE-167 (Date & Numeric formats): DCAT lacking in date, time and number formats [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 11 June)
Deirdre Lee
Eric Stephan
Erik Wilde
Ghislain Atemezing
Hadley Beeman
Herbert Van de Sompel
João Paulo Almeida
Laufer
Makx Dekkers
Maurino Andrea
Newton Calegari
Peter.Winstanley@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
Phil Archer
- Publications live (Thursday, 25 June)
- Coincidentally... (Wednesday, 24 June)
- Enrichment document (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: DUV FPWD (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: DUV FPWD (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: DUV FPWD (Tuesday, 23 June)
- Re: DUV FPWD (Monday, 22 June)
- DUV FPWD (Monday, 22 June)
- BP doc ready for 2015-06-25 (Monday, 22 June)
- Re: BP document - 2nd draft is ready to be published (Monday, 22 June)
- New Connection method from *this Friday* (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Suggestion for context section (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Fwd: FW: Re: dwbp-ISSUE-184: Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: TPAC 2015 (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: Minor changes suggested for BP (Thursday, 11 June)
- Minor changes suggested for BP (Thursday, 11 June)
- BPs on Data Identification (Wednesday, 3 June)
Riccardo Albertoni
Steven Adler
Wagner Meira Jr.
yaso@nic.br
Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2015 16:50:47 UTC