W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > June 2015

Re: BPs on Data Identification

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:40:56 -0300
Message-ID: <CANx1Pzxc+3tzU-Qxmk-mMzw4cpzUuW-b4KAKqfNDFGnkt+WYAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>
Hi Phil,

Thanks a lot for the new BP! I liked the BP and I really liked the
introduction because it helps to understand the context where BP will be
applied (identifiers for datasets and versions of datasets). IMO this is
going in the right direction!

I think we should update the document to include these new BP and the new
introduction for the Data Identification section.

Cheers,
Bernadette

2015-06-03 15:25 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>:

> Dear all,
>
> Hadley and I took an action *way* back to offer some new text for the
> section on Data Identification. I have finally got around to doing it,
> although I am sure I could add more in future.
>
> The text I have (re)written is on the wiki at [1]. My suggestion is that
> this replaces the text in the current editor's draft as Data Identification
> [2]. It extends the intro and creates a new BP around IDs for versions.
>
> In more detail:
>
> The section intro is unambiguous about identifiers. The current text says
> that datasets should have identifiers. My version says that should have
> URIs (for W3C, this is gospel).
>
> I felt it wise to set out why URIs are so important and the differences
> between URL, URI and IRI.
>
> I've taken this a little further and set out what I regard as some of the
> key points about URIs (currently 5 of them). This is drawn from experience
> of talking to various groups. I am guilty of assuming that everyone knows
> this stuff - which I really, really shouldn't!
>
> BP: User persistent URIs as identifiers.
>
> This is a modified version of the existing BP. It introduces the notion of
> persistence and, if the WG adopts this, I plan to include the 10 Rules for
> Persistent Identifiers that the current text links to.
>
> It also refers to purl.org and DOIs as alternatives.
>
> Then I added a new BP on identifiers for versions. This doesn't contradict
> the BP in the previous section that talks about Memento but the two
> together are perhaps a little awkward - something to discuss.
>
> I put all this on the wiki, not in the BP doc as it is for the editors and
> the WG to decide whether this is going in the right direction. I can add it
> to the doc quickly if needed (needless to say with or without amendments).
>
> HTH
>
> Phil
>
> For tracker, this is Issue-157
>
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/BP_Data_Identification
> [2] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DataIdentification
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>



-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 5 June 2015 12:41:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 5 June 2015 12:41:47 UTC