W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > June 2015

RE: reviewing the BP doc

From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:56:02 +0200
To: "'Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group'" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001d0b262$9368c340$ba3a49c0$@makxdekkers.com>
*  I don't think that a Dataset is an abstract thing. But I agree that distributions of a Dataset (DCAT definition) are instances of the same Dataset source.  And this is one of the possible relations between Datasets.

In my perspective, a Dataset *is* an abstract thing. It only physically exists in its Distributions. For example, a Dataset may not have Distributions, e.g. if a description of a Dataset is generated before the data is collected (the Dataset of tomorrow’s weather observations) or a description still exists in the Catalog after the data files have been deleted. In my mind, that means a Dataset is an abstract entity.

The description of ADMS http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-adms/, a specification closely related to DCAT, is more explicit about this. It defines  adms:Asset, a subclass of dcat:Dataset, as: “An abstract entity that reflects the intellectual content of the asset and represents those characteristics of the asset that are independent of its physical embodiment.”

Makx.

 

 

 
Received on Monday, 29 June 2015 11:56:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 June 2015 11:56:36 UTC