public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org from September 2016 by thread

CSUN lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 28 September)

• Re: CSUN Thad C (Wednesday, 28 September)
• RE: CSUN Rochford, John (Wednesday, 28 September)
  • Re: CSUN Kurt Mattes (Wednesday, 28 September)

task-completion SC approval lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 28 September)

• Re: task-completion SC approval Thad C (Thursday, 29 September)

accessible-authentication approval lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 28 September)

making the case for each SC lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 28 September)

IBM Content Clarifier Kurt Mattes (Monday, 26 September)

• Re: IBM Content Clarifier Steve Lee (Tuesday, 27 September)

Minutes from today's call lisa.seeman (Monday, 26 September)

Regrets Rochford, John (Monday, 26 September)

• Re: Regrets Steve Lee (Monday, 26 September)

Minimize user errors lisa.seeman (Sunday, 25 September)

• Re: Minimize user errors Thad C (Sunday, 25 September)
  • RE: Minimize user errors EA Draffan (Monday, 26 September)
    • Re: Minimize user errors Thad C (Monday, 26 September)
      • RE: Minimize user errors EA Draffan (Monday, 26 September)
  • RE: Minimize user errors Rochford, John (Monday, 26 September)
• RE: Minimize user errors Michael Pluke (Monday, 26 September)

voice menu systems lisa.seeman (Sunday, 25 September)

• RE: voice menu systems EA Draffan (Monday, 26 September)
• RE: voice menu systems Michael Pluke (Monday, 26 September)

Are you on schedule? lisa.seeman (Sunday, 25 September)

• RE: Are you on schedule? Michael Pluke (Monday, 26 September)
  • RE: Are you on schedule? lisa.seeman (Monday, 26 September)
    • RE: Are you on schedule? Michael Pluke (Monday, 26 September)
      • RE: Are you on schedule? lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 27 September)

tracking table of the Success criteria here lisa.seeman (Sunday, 25 September)

The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference -Monday, 26 September 2016 lisa.seeman (Sunday, 25 September)

• RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference -Monday, 26 September 2016 Deborah Dahl (Monday, 26 September)

commenting on W3C process and where they are hard lisa.seeman (Sunday, 25 September)

Minutes from TPAC lisa.seeman (Thursday, 22 September)

• Re: Minutes from TPAC Thad C (Thursday, 22 September)

Fwd: Re: testability lisa.seeman (Thursday, 22 September)

I've been meaning to send you these videos of "disability etiquette gone wrong" Deborah Dahl (Thursday, 22 September)

call is set up lisa.seeman (Thursday, 22 September)

Where is w3c stuff too hard.. lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 21 September)

• RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. Rochford, John (Wednesday, 21 September)
  • RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. Deborah Dahl (Wednesday, 21 September)
    • RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 21 September)
      • RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. Thad C (Thursday, 22 September)
        • RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. Milliken, Neil (Thursday, 22 September)
          • RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. EA Draffan (Thursday, 22 September)
            • RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. Michael Pluke (Thursday, 22 September)
            • Re: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. John Foliot (Thursday, 22 September)
            • RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. Thad C (Thursday, 22 September)
    • RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard.. Michael Pluke (Wednesday, 21 September)

no call in for the rest of the afternoon lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 20 September)

Call in now lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 20 September)

• Re: Call in now Thad C (Tuesday, 20 September)
  • Re: Call in now lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 20 September)
    • Re: Call in now Thad C (Tuesday, 20 September)

Potentially useful article Steve Lee (Tuesday, 20 September)

Article on coga design Steve Lee (Monday, 19 September)

proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables lisa.seeman (Sunday, 18 September)

• Re: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables Michael Pluke (Sunday, 18 September)
  • Re: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables Steve Lee (Monday, 19 September)
    • Re: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables Thad C (Monday, 19 September)
    • Re: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables Rich Schwerdtfeger (Monday, 19 September)
• RE: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables Rochford, John (Monday, 19 September)
  • RE: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables Deborah Dahl (Monday, 19 September)
  • RE: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables EA Draffan (Tuesday, 20 September)

more example SC lisa.seeman (Sunday, 18 September)

Calling in tomorow lisa.seeman (Sunday, 18 September)

• Re: Calling in tomorow Mary Jo Mueller (Monday, 19 September)
• RE: Calling in tomorow Rochford, John (Monday, 19 September)
  • RE: Calling in tomorow lisa.seeman (Monday, 19 September)

rewording lisa.seeman (Friday, 16 September)

Tracking Success Criteria Progress (LVTF Table) Rochford, John (Thursday, 15 September)

• Re: Tracking Success Criteria Progress (LVTF Table) lisa.seeman (Thursday, 15 September)
  • Re: Tracking Success Criteria Progress (LVTF Table) Thad C (Thursday, 15 September)
    • Re: Tracking Success Criteria Progress (LVTF Table) steve@opendirective.com (Thursday, 15 September)
  • Re: Tracking Success Criteria Progress (LVTF Table) Mary Jo Mueller (Thursday, 15 September)

are any more sc almost ready? lisa.seeman (Thursday, 15 September)

clear-purpose.htm lisa.seeman (Thursday, 15 September)

• Re: clear-purpose.htm Steve Lee (Thursday, 15 September)
  • Re: clear-purpose.htm lisa.seeman (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: clear-purpose.htm Thad C (Thursday, 15 September)

Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Thursday, 15 September)

• Re: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) lisa.seeman (Thursday, 15 September)
  • Re: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) lisa.seeman (Thursday, 15 September)
    • RE: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Thursday, 15 September)
      • RE: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Thad C (Thursday, 15 September)
    • RE: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Friday, 16 September)
      • RE: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Thad C (Friday, 16 September)
        • RE: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Saturday, 17 September)
          • RE: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Thad C (Saturday, 17 September)
            • RE: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Saturday, 17 September)
  • RE: Re: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Thursday, 15 September)

calling in for TPAC lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 14 September)

Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Tuesday, 13 September)

• Re: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 14 September)
  • RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Wednesday, 14 September)
    • RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 14 September)
      • RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Wednesday, 14 September)
        • RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 14 September)
          • what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 14 September)
            • RE: what is the consensus? was RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Wednesday, 14 September)
• RE: Argument to revert my "User authentication methods" success criteria to the pre-5th Sept COGA call version (with a small mod) Michael Pluke (Wednesday, 14 September)

timeline lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 13 September)

• Re: timeline Thad C (Tuesday, 13 September)
  • Re: timeline Ayelet Seeman (Tuesday, 13 September)
    • Re: timeline John Kirkwood (Tuesday, 13 September)
      • RE: timeline Rochford, John (Tuesday, 13 September)
        • Re: timeline Rich Schwerdtfeger (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: timeline Steve Lee (Tuesday, 13 September)
  • RE: timeline EA Draffan (Tuesday, 13 September)

Testability lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 13 September)

• Re: Testability Thad C (Wednesday, 14 September)

minutes from today lisa.seeman (Monday, 12 September)

Online Safety SC Rochford, John (Monday, 12 September)

• Re: Online Safety SC lisa.seeman (Monday, 12 September)
• How to do the benefits section lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 13 September)
• Re: Online Safety SC lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 13 September)

Timed Events SC For Review Thad C (Monday, 12 September)

• Timed Events SC For Review lisa.seeman (Sunday, 25 September)
  • RE: Timed Events SC For Review EA Draffan (Monday, 26 September)
    • RE: Timed Events SC For Review Michael Pluke (Monday, 26 September)
  • RE: Timed Events SC For Review Michael Pluke (Monday, 26 September)
    • RE: Timed Events SC For Review lisa.seeman (Monday, 26 September)
      • RE: Timed Events SC For Review Michael Pluke (Monday, 26 September)

Navigation and GPS lisa.seeman (Monday, 12 September)

The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, September 12, 2016 lisa.seeman (Sunday, 11 September)

• RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, September 12, 2016 Deborah Dahl (Monday, 12 September)

Clarification on Minimize User Errors and Associated SC Thad C (Sunday, 11 September)

• Re: Clarification on Minimize User Errors and Associated SC lisa.seeman (Sunday, 11 September)
  • Re: Clarification on Minimize User Errors and Associated SC Thad C (Sunday, 11 September)
    • Re: Clarification on Minimize User Errors and Associated SC lisa.seeman (Monday, 12 September)

volunteer needed lisa.seeman (Friday, 9 September)

Any more SC's ready? lisa.seeman (Friday, 9 September)

• Re: Any more SC's ready? Thad C (Friday, 9 September)
  • Re: Any more SC's ready? lisa.seeman (Friday, 9 September)

SC updates lisa.seeman (Thursday, 8 September)

Online Safety Success Criteria Rochford, John (Thursday, 8 September)

• Re: Online Safety Success Criteria lisa.seeman (Thursday, 8 September)
  • RE: Online Safety Success Criteria Rochford, John (Thursday, 8 September)
    • RE: Online Safety Success Criteria lisa.seeman (Sunday, 11 September)

Fwd: Coga disability guide Steve Lee (Thursday, 8 September)

schedules lisa.seeman (Monday, 5 September)

clear-purpose success cryteria lisa.seeman (Monday, 5 September)

Approving SC by email -3.1 lisa.seeman (Monday, 5 September)

• Re: Approving SC by email -3.1 Steve Lee (Tuesday, 6 September)
  • Re: Approving SC by email -3.1 Kurt Mattes (Tuesday, 6 September)
    • RE: Approving SC by email -3.1 Rochford, John (Tuesday, 6 September)
      • Re: Approving SC by email -3.1 John Foliot (Wednesday, 7 September)
        • Re: Approving SC by email -3.1 Thad C (Thursday, 8 September)
        • RE: Approving SC by email -3.1 Rochford, John (Thursday, 8 September)
          • RE: Approving SC by email -3.1 Mary Jo Mueller (Thursday, 8 September)

minutes from todays call lisa.seeman (Monday, 5 September)

Re: Draft SC for Obvious purpose Steve Lee (Monday, 5 September)

• Re: Draft SC for Obvious purpose lisa.seeman (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Draft SC for Obvious purpose Steve Lee (Monday, 5 September)

Re: Success Criterion Proposal and Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, August 29, 2016 lisa.seeman (Monday, 5 September)

• RE: Success Criterion Proposal and Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, August 29, 2016 Michael Pluke (Monday, 5 September)
  • Re: Success Criterion Proposal and Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, August 29, 2016 Steve Lee (Wednesday, 7 September)

Thurdays in october lisa.seeman (Monday, 5 September)

• RE: Thurdays in october Michael Pluke (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Thurdays in october Kurt Mattes (Tuesday, 6 September)
  • RE: Thurdays in october EA Draffan (Tuesday, 6 September)

Are there more SC ready to review? lisa.seeman (Sunday, 4 September)

• Re: Are there more SC ready to review? Thad C (Sunday, 4 September)

The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, September 5, 2016 lisa.seeman (Sunday, 4 September)

• RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, September 5, 2016 EA Draffan (Sunday, 4 September)
• RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, September 5, 2016 ding c. (cd8e10) (Monday, 5 September)

some more changes lisa.seeman (Friday, 2 September)

captions and complex images lisa.seeman (Thursday, 1 September)

• Re: captions and complex images Thad C (Thursday, 1 September)

Last message date: Thursday, 29 September 2016 14:30:37 UTC