W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > September 2016

RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard..

From: Thad C <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:12:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOh2y+9V-8PiSn7XMqixLjrjjV4Ub3Lq1Lod1DeoWR2Zaj3qyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lisa. seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, debra <debra@ruhglobal.com>, Jamie Knight <jamie.knight@bbc.co.uk>, "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
How about Github? Github has additional functionality other than the
typical repo structure. For instance gists which are basically very simple
text files that are very easy to use and create.

I'm fine with Google docs as well if it works for others.

Best,
Thaddeus
On Sep 21, 2016 7:05 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> The problem with other tools is they are hard to use. We won't get the
> feedback we need if it is hard
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:26:07 +0300 Deborah Dahl<dahl@conversational-
> technologies.com> wrote ----
>
> We were talking at the Chairs breakfast yesterday about Google Docs being
> forbidden in certain countries and by certain companies, but I don’t know
> if it affects anyone who’d like to contribute to this. If so, maybe we
> could look for open source collaborative editing tools that might not be
> restricted.
>
>
>
> *From:* Rochford, John [mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2016 2:20 PM
> *To:* 'lisa.seeman' <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>; public-cognitive-a11y-tf <
> public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>; Jamie Knight <jamie.knight@bbc.co.uk>;
> debra <debra@ruhglobal.com>
> *Subject:* RE: Where is w3c stuff too hard..
>
>
>
> Hi Lisa,
>
>
>
> A good resource, published a couple days ago, is:
>
> ·      A11y Hacks for the Blind: Navigating GitHub & the W3C
> <http://www.deque.com/blog/birkirs-bats-flight-accessibility-hacks-blind/>
>
>
>
> Google Docs should be okay for me.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> John Rochford <http://profiles.umassmed.edu/profiles/display/132901>
> UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
> Director, INDEX Program
> Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
> www.DisabilityInfo.org
> Twitter: @ClearHelper <https://twitter.com/clearhelper>
>
>
>
> *Confidentiality Notice:*
>
> *This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies
> of the original message.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 6:00 AM
> To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>; Jamie
> Knight <jamie.knight@bbc.co.uk>; debra <debra@ruhglobal.com>
> Subject: Where is w3c stuff too hard..
>
>
>
> Hi folks
>
>
>
> I know a lot if us struggle with using the w3c technology and processes. I
> would like to set up s page for feedback and suggesting that we can give to
> the w3c so they can make it easier for us and encourage participation.
>
>
>
> Would a google doc be a good way to collect this feedback? Is it ok for
> the low vision and blind members.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All the best
>
>
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
>
>
> LinkedIn < <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>
> http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 02:14:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 22 September 2016 02:14:23 UTC