Re: proposal to publish it the gap analysis/roadmap with the improved tables

+1

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 19, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 look fit for purpose to me 
> 
> Steve Lee
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> 
>> On 18 September 2016 at 09:58, Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> with a minor minor editorial. In the first cell of the "Authoring Techniques" column in table 1 there is a "not" missing in the following:
>> "... how to have security that does use passwords..."
>> 
>> Best regards 
>> 
>> Mike 
>> 
>> Sent using CloudMagic Email
>> 
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:16 am, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
>> Hi Folks
>> 
>> The user tables of the gap analysis/roadmap  are at a much much better place then they were when we first requested that they should be published.
>> I have also spell checked them :)
>> 
>> As the gap analysis is not yet published anyway, I would like to propose we  publish it with the improved tables.
>> (I know they still need work and more input from the task force but they are much better.)
>> 
>> 
>> See https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html (new version - much much better)
>> and https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/#roadmap---tables-of-user-needs (old version)
>> 
>> Please send +1 to approve or -1 (with the reason) to disagree.
>> 
>> Thanks and...
>> 
>> 
>> All the best
>> 
>> Lisa Seeman
>> 
>> LinkedIn, Twitter
> 

Received on Monday, 19 September 2016 16:41:06 UTC