W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Testability

From: Thad C <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:42:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOh2y+9eTjg6XqeasfBqrRUX0=+am3WiCO-UNnpwdfm1j_kjiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lisa. seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Yes, this clarifies the topic a bit more for me. Thanks for the call out.

Thaddeus
On Sep 13, 2016 5:23 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> In the section on testability we need a description of how this SC can be
> tested. This may include manual, automated, or semi-automated mechanisms.
>
> Manual - If you have ten educated people in the room, will they all agree
> that something conforms?
>
> You may want to do the techniques first (see bellow), and then say how you
> can see if you conform to a success technique. This is a way of testing
> conformance.
>
> Does everyone find this clear? Do we need more instruction form the WCAG
> chairs?
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 04:43:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 14 September 2016 04:43:34 UTC